Legal Opinion · Dissent

Endsley v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 2, 1999No. WD 56653Published

1DissentHanna, Judge

I respectfully dissent. There was other competent and substantial evidence of the defendant’s blood alcohol level in excess of the legal limit. See Reinert v. Director of Revenue, 894 S.W.2d 162 (Mo. banc 1995). More importantly, I do not agree that the mechanical failure to check a box on a report is substantial evidence that the officer failed to perform the test in light of his unequivocal and unchallenged testimony that he did perform the required check, and the lack of any evidence that the simulator malfunctioned. See Hurley v. Director of Revenue, 982 S.W.2d 694 (Mo.App.1998); Anderson…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Collins v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. Sellenriek v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Reinert v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. Hawk v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MO.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Shine v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API