Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Buckley v. Drake

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 24, 1914No. 3391PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from County Court, Le Flore County; P. C. Bolger, Judge. Action on a forfeited bail bond by the State, on the relation of W. D. Buckley, against John E. Drake and another. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

This is a suit by plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against John E. Drake, as principal, and T. B. Wall, as-surety, defendants in error, to recover on a forfeited bail bond in the sum of $500, conditioned for the appearance of Drake at the next regular term of the county court of Le Flore county to be held October 3, 1910, to answer to a charge of selling intoxicating liquor. After issue joined by answer there was trial to a jury, and judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings the case here.

It is assigned that the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for plaintiff. The facts are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. United States v. Van FossenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1871
  3. People v. PennimanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. United States v. McGlashenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1895
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Boice v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. Abel v. State Ex Rel. SayeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Metcalf v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Ward v. State ex rel. CarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. Pruitt v. State Ex Rel. FarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API