Legal Opinion

Pruitt v. State Ex Rel. Farris

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 12, 1939No. 29208PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error to recover the penalty named in a forfeited appearance bond. The issue joined by the answer was that the action was premature. Trial was had to the court without the intervention of a jury and resulted in a judgment in favor of the defendant in error.

The sole issue which this appeal presents for determination is one of law. The relevant facts are not in dispute and are substantially as follows: The principal named in the appearance bond deliberately breached its terms by refusing to appear when trial of his case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Buckley v. DrakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. State Ex Rel. Williams v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maryland National Insurance Co. v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. Manning v. State Ex Rel. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Ward v. State ex rel. CarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Wilson v. State Ex Rel. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  5. White v. State ex rel. TrimbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API