People v. Dunbar
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendants appeal from their convictions of criminal sale of marihuana in the fourth degree entered, upon their pleas of guilty, in satisfaction of the indictments against them.
Contrary to defendant Wolf son’s argument, the prosecution was not barred by the alleged representation or promise that the “book would be closed” following completion of the internal, administrative investigation of marihuana use by members of the Nassau County District Attorney’s staff. Immunity may be conferred by operation of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. KazmarickNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. SteudingNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
3Cited by61 opinions
- People v. HansenNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. GerberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.