Legal Opinion

People v. Dunbar

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1981PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendants appeal from their convictions of criminal sale of marihuana in the fourth degree entered, upon their pleas of guilty, in satisfaction of the indictments against them.

Contrary to defendant Wolf son’s argument, the prosecution was not barred by the alleged representation or promise that the “book would be closed” following completion of the internal, administrative investigation of marihuana use by members of the Nassau County District Attorney’s staff. Immunity may be conferred by operation of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. KazmarickNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. SteudingNew York Court of Appeals · 1959

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. People v. HansenNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. GerberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API