Legal Opinion

Wasserman v. City of Lebanon

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 23, 1984No. 83-062; No. 83-105PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

We have consolidated for purposes of appeal an interlocutory transfer without ruling, see Supreme Court Rule 9, and an appeal from a ruling of the superior court. The issues in the two actions are related and arise out of a common factual background. The decisions of the Lebanon Zoning Board of Adjustment and Planning Board are the focus of the controversy. Those decisions deny the plaintiffs’ predecessor-in-interest permission to build a replacement dam, on a site known as the Cummings Dam, on the Mascoma River in Lebanon.

The principal question before us is whether RSA chapters 481 and 482…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stablex Corp. v. Town of HooksettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  2. State v. DriscollSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Town of Salisbury v. New England Power Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  4. J. E. D. Associates, Inc. v. Town of SandownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Appeal of Coastal Materials Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. Casico, Inc. v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  3. Arthur Whitcomb, Inc. v. Town of CarrollSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  4. Bio Energy, LLC v. Town of HopkintonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  5. Lakeside Lodge, Inc. v. Town of New LondonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API