Legal Opinion
Pohl v. Anderson
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 15, 1936No. Civ. 5516PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, J., pro tem.
Appellant seeks to enjoin respondents from unfair competition and to recover damages alleged to arise therefrom. The case was tried by the court, and findings on all issues were made adversely to appellant, who now appeals from a judgment denying him any relief.
The trial court found that plaintiff, on or about May 1, 1928, established in the city of Tracy, California, a “drive-in” dispensing booth for the sale of drinks; that said booth was shaped in the form of a giant orange, and was painted an orange color; that plaintiff advertised his fresh orange drinks through the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- American Waltham Watch Co. v. United States Watch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- American Automobile Ass'n v. American Automobile Owners Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Dunston v. Los Angeles Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Hatton v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
- National Van Lines, a Corporation v. Alfred E. Dean, Trading Under the Firm Name of National Transfer & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Winfield v. CharlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Family Record Plan, Inc. v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.