Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronald Henry

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 15, 1989No. 88-8590PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents the question whether the acceptance of responsibility provision, section 3E1.1, of the Sentencing Guidelines 1 violates either the fifth or sixth amendment to the Constitution. 2 Appellant contends that section 3E1.1 violates the fifth amendment 3 where, as here, the defendant has testified to his innocence at trial: if he is convicted, he later must in effect confess to perjury to receive a lower sentence; thus, section 3E1.1 penalizes him if he does not confess and, therefore, punishes him for failing to incriminate himself. Appellant contends that the section violates…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Hitchcock v. DuggerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Corbitt v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Joseph L. Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. United States v. Eric Parker, Gary Phillips, and Keith MoonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. BarringtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Harold A. Ebbole v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Miles Davis SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Ervin Earl RutterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API