Hitchcock v. Dugger
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
We have held that in capital cases, “‘the sentenced” may not refuse to consider or “ ‘be precluded from considering’ ” any relevant mitigating evidence. Skipper v. South Carolina, 476 U. S. 1, 4 (1986) (quoting Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U. S. 104, 114 (1982)). See also Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U. S. 586, 604 (1978) (plurality opinion). Certiorari was granted in the present case to consider petitioner’s contention that he was sentenced to death under a Florida statute that operated in a manner inconsistent with this requirement. 1 476 U. S. 1168 (1986).
H
On July 31, 1976, 13-year-old Cynthia…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Skipper v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Songer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by736 opinions
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Burger v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mills v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
731 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.