Legal Opinion
Gausvik v. Perez
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided September 16, 2002No. CS-01-071-AAMPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PART, INTER ALIA
MCDONALD, Senior District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is the Motion of defendants Perez, Badgley, Tilly and City of Wenatchee for Summary Judgment (Ct.Rec.117) 1 ; plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Ct.Rec.130); plaintiffs Motion for Rule 56(g) Sanctions and/or Order on Contempt (Ct.Ree.202); and plaintiffs Motion to Supplement Summary Judgment Response.
Per LR 7.1(h)(3) the court has exercised its discretion to consider all of these motions without oral argument.
I. BACKGROUND
Defendant Robert Perez of the City…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gausvik v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Gausvik v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Gausvik v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Gausvik v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Gausvik v. AbbeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.