Legal Opinion

Collier v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 3, 2010No. 1091327PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYONS, Justice.

Lee M. Collier filed in the trial court a motion pursuant to Rule 29, Ala. R.Crim. P., that he entitled “Motion to Correct Clerical Error in Calculation of Credit Toward Sentence for Time Spent Incarcerated Pending Trial.” The trial court summarily denied the motion without requiring a response from the State. Collier appealed. The Court of Criminal Appeals treated Collier’s motion as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and it affirmed the judgment of the trial court on the basis that Collier did not verify his petition and therefore did not properly commence his action.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SeymourSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. Swicegood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  3. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  4. Boutwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  5. Breach v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rivera-Moreno v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  2. Hughley v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
  3. McLeod v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  4. Justin Paul Gates v. Marengo County Justice DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2026
  5. McLeod v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API