Michel v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
j
Dwayne, Donna, and Viola Michel own property in the state of Washington. Their land shares common borders with, and in some locations is completely circumscribed by, a national wildlife refuge owned by the United States. Historically, the Michels have used roads and trails across the refuge to conduct their cattle and farming business. Since 1960, the Michels and the government have engaged in a series of disputes and negotiations over the scope of the Michels’ right of access to roads and trails across refuge land. Although the parties appeared to resolve the problem on several occasions,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School LandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Regina (Rega) Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., and Sydney TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Kinscherff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Paul G. Shultz v. Department of Army, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Park County, Montana, and Sweet Grass County, Montana v. United States of America, Cross Creek Protective Association, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Kingman Reef Atoll Investments, L.L.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- State Of Alaska v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Kane County, Utah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Spirit Lake Tribe v. North DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.