Legal Opinion

Pyle v. Amsler

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 29, 1957No. 5-1256PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Ward, Associate Justice.

The petitioner by this writ seeks an interpretation of the language used in Section 2 of Act 49 of the Acts of 1955, which section is also § 27-1135 of Arkansas Stats. Supp. For the purpose of this opinion the material part of the aforementioned section reads as follows: ‘ ‘ The defense to any complaint or cross complaint must be filed the first day after the expiration of the periods of time set forth below, as the case may be: First. Where the summons has been served 20 days in any county in the State;”

On September 11, 1956, Lakeside School District No. 1 filed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walden v. MetzlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Huffman v. City of Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  2. Fitzwater v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  3. Moore v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  4. Barkis v. BellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  5. Mann v. Ray Lee SupplySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API