Legal Opinion

Mann v. Ray Lee Supply

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 12, 1976No. 75-343PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

In this suit upon a $454.96 open account the trial court entered a default judgment against the appellant, for his failure to answer interrogatories propounded by the plaintiff. For reversal it is argued that the statute relied upon in the court below does not apply to interrogatories and that the court erred in entering judgment without notifying the defendant that a trial was to be held.

The appellant had filed a general denial. The plaintiff’s nine interrogatories were not answered within the 15 days allowed by the statute, which does apply to interrogatories.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walden v. MetzlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. Pyle v. AmslerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  3. Alger v. BeasleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Viking Ins. Co. of Wisconsin v. JesterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Cagle v. FennelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Burton v. SparlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Graham v. SledgeCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Tricou v. ACI Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API