Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Nelson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 20, 1976No. 51600PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Presiding Judge.

1. Established lines and not new ones are to be fixed in a processioning proceeding; the location of lines, not as they ought to be, but as they actually exist, is to be sought (Bowen v. Jackson, 101 Ga. 817 (29 SE 40); Crawford v. Wheeler, 111 Ga. 870 (36 SE 954)); that is, those which can be taken as formerly located and established. Pearre v. Wilkinson, 181 Ga. 619 (183 SE 626). Processioners have jurisdiction and authority only to ascertain and mark anew the old lines which have previously been designated on the surface of the earth; they cannot set up a line…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bowen v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Crawford v. WheelerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Cleveland v. TreadwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  4. Anthony v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  5. Langley v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Osborne v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Spivey v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API