Cleveland v. Treadwell

1. Where the judge who presided at the trial of a case did not hear the motion for a new trial, but it was heard and overruled by the judge of another circuit temporarily presiding, the reluctance of this court to interfere with a verdict approved by the presiding judge, as contrary to law and evidence, has no application.

2. The charge of the court was fair and legal.

3. The verdict was contrary to law.

(a.) Where two persons, owning land under a common feoffor, had agreed upon and marked a dividing line between them, and subsequently processioners were called in by the vendees of such parties…