Dr. Pepper Finance Corp. v. Cooper
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Wyatt, Presiding Justice.
The demurrers to the affidavit of illegality, the motion for new trial, and the motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict all present the same questions and will be considered together. There is no conflict in the evidence. The only question presented is a legal one, which is whether, under the facts alleged and proved, the defendant,' having admitted a prima facie case, is entitled to be relieved of the obligations placed upon him by his contract.
The contract here involved provided, among other things, as follows: “3. Purchaser agrees as follows ... to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. Ragsdale Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Eloyd v. WoodsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Martin v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Butts v. GrooverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Seigler v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
3Cited by9 opinions
- Charter Medical Management Co. v. Ware Manor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- American Food Services, Inc. v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Bimbo Builders, Inc. v. STUBBS PROPERTIES, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Bowen Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- McClelland v. Westview Cementery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.