United States v. Joey Santillan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:
Santillan was prosecuted under the Lacey Act for bringing ten baby parrots across the border from Tijuana. His appeal raises, among other issues, a significant question about the mens rea needed under the Lacey Act.
Facts
Santillan was convicted of smuggling 1 and importing wildlife in violation of the Lacey Act. 2 Santillan owned a tropical fish store in Southern California. Returning home from a trip to Tijuana, he said he had nothing to declare. But actually, he had with him ten baby parrots packed in three paper bags stuffed under his car seats. When he was asked…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. CordobaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Christopher Fredrick Vonwillie, AKA Christopher Fred VonwillieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Micky Joe Vaandering, United States of America v. Jeffrey Wayne McMillanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerald ORTLAND, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Oscar Acosta DelgadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Julius Chow Lieh LiuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Dennis Leveque, United States of America v. John Kevin MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Gerald A. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001