Legal Opinion

Nelson-Wiggen Piano Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 2, 1936No. 5523PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Appellant sued to recover a payment of $10,384.37 for manufacturer’s excise taxes -imposed by the Revenue Act of 1924 on sales of coin-operated devices, alleged to have been wrongfully assessed and collected on automatic pianos. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue found that automatic pianos manufactured and sold by appellant were coin-operated de*48vices within section 600 (8) of the Revenue Act of 1924, 43 Stat. 322, which levies a tax upon “coin-operated devices, coin-operated machines, and devices and machines operated by any substitute for a coin.” The District…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walker v. Alamo Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
  2. Big Diamond Mills Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  3. Ely & Walker Dry Goods Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  4. Rasmussen v. Brownfield-Canty Carpet Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  5. Zemurray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Joyce v. GentschCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  2. Latimer v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1943
  3. Schneider v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  4. Western Maryland Ry. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API