Legal Opinion

Rasmussen v. Brownfield-Canty Carpet Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 11, 1929No. 5300PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). On the writ of error two questions are presented: First, whether on March 16, 1925, the distraint proceeding was barred by the internal revenue law of 1924 (43 Stat. 253); and, second, whether the answer, by alleging that the $1,000 which was offered in compromise was subsequently applied on the assessment for the year ending January 31, 1919, at the direction of the plaintiff, pleaded a voluntary payment, so as to bar recovery thereof.

Two income tax returns were filed by the plaintiff for the year ending January 31, 1919, a tentative return on March 15,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chesebrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Fox v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  3. United States v. WhyelDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. In Re McClure Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1927
  5. United States v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mudd v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. James Boyd Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. Moses v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  4. Nelson-Wiggen Piano Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  5. Parish-Watson Co. v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API