Rasmussen v. Brownfield-Canty Carpet Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). On the writ of error two questions are presented: First, whether on March 16, 1925, the distraint proceeding was barred by the internal revenue law of 1924 (43 Stat. 253); and, second, whether the answer, by alleging that the $1,000 which was offered in compromise was subsequently applied on the assessment for the year ending January 31, 1919, at the direction of the plaintiff, pleaded a voluntary payment, so as to bar recovery thereof.
Two income tax returns were filed by the plaintiff for the year ending January 31, 1919, a tentative return on March 15,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chesebrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Fox v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- United States v. WhyelDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1927
- In Re McClure Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1927
- United States v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mudd v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- James Boyd Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Moses v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Nelson-Wiggen Piano Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
- Parish-Watson Co. v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.