Legal Opinion
Village of Oconomowoc Lake v. Dayton Hudson Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 18, 1994No. 93-3380PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
Target Stores, a division of Dayton Hudson Corporation, is building a warehouse (which it calls a “distribution center”) in the City of Oconomowoc, Wisconsin. It holds all necessary state and local permits. Federal clearance is unnecessary, for the Environmental Protection Agency has authorized Wisconsin to perform the tasks required by the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts. The Village of Oconomowoc Lake, a nearby municipality, wishes the warehouse would disappear. We have for decision one among more than a dozen suits and administrative proceedings the Village has…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hallstrom v. Tillamook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Supporters to Oppose Pollution, Inc. v. The Heritage GroupCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Atlantic States Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Cordiano v. Metacon Gun Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Prairie Rivers Network v. Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
- United Steelworkers of America v. Oregon Steel Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Friends of Santa Fe County v. LAC Minerals, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1995
- Rice v. Harken Exploration Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.