Legal Opinion
In Re Kenick
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 18, 2007No. 2007-240PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.
The petitioner, Ruth Kenick, appeals an order of the Brentwood Family Division {Hurd, J.) granting a motion filed by the respondent, Wayne Bailey, to dismiss her request for alimony. We affirm.
The record supports the following facts: The parties were married in 1983 and divorced in 1996. When they divorced, they stipulated that neither would pay alimony to the other. In October 2006, the petitioner filed a motion to bring forward, requesting alimony because a recent medical condition allegedly prevents her from working. The respondent moved to dismiss, arguing that RSA 458:19, I (Supp. 2006)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re DonovanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- In re GoldmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Eldridge v. EldridgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Henry v. HenrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- In re BeauregardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- General Insulation Co. v. Eckman ConstructionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- In Re DuftonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- In the Matter of Danielle Ross and Christopher RossSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Town of Bartlett v. Edward C. Furlong, III d/b/a Lil' Man Snowmobile RentalsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015