Legal Opinion

Vilis Martins Lapenieks v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 11, 1968No. 21199_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEEKS, District Judge.

This appeal is from an order of the District Court denying a petition for naturalization filed pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1427. The trial court denied the petition on the ground that in 1952 the appellant had availed himself of an exemption from military service, as a Latvian national residing in the United States, where one of the conditions of claiming said exemption was permanent ineligibility for citizenship. In 1956, a change in Selective Service regulations eliminated the exemption, and appellant was reclassified I-A. He never served in the military, however, because…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ceballos v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. Otto Klaus Gunther HoellgerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  3. In the Matter of the Petition of Jose Dominguez Rego for Naturalization. Jose Dominguez RegoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  4. Garrett Aiden Cannon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  5. In Re Petition for Naturalization of Annibale Cuozzo United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Astrup v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. F & J Enterprises, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1974
  3. In re Naturalization of WendtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
  4. Itzcovitz v. SELECTIVE SERVICE LOCAL BOARD NUMBER 6, NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  5. MINCHEFFBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API