Legal Opinion
Lovejoy, Russell & James v. Graham
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 14, 1912No. 3346PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Error from District Court, Garvin County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by J. W. Graham and others against Love joy, Russell & James. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Motion for new trial, having been filed in due time, was overruled on May 29, 1911. The court on said date also made the following order:
“And defendants are given by the court, in open court, ninety days to make, then ten days for plaintiff to suggest amendments and five days to settle a case-made for'the Supreme Court and sixty days thereafter to file same, with petition in error, in the Supreme Court.”
Plaintiffs would not be required to suggest amendments until the case-made had been made and served upon them. The case-made was not served upon the plaintiff-s until after said ninety days…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bettis v. CargileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Ellis v. CarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Lathim v. SchlackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Soliss v. Davis, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Maddox v. DrakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Petty v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Tanner v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Bass v. DowdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Bowers v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Lawson v. ZeiglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.