Legal Opinion

Lathim v. Schlack

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 16, 1910No. 1623PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from District Court, Pittsburg County; Preslie B. Cole, Judge. Action between J. M. Lathim and Gr. D. Schlack. From the judgment, Lathim brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

This appeai i,s from an order quashing a garnishee summons and discharging a garnishment after judgment. The order appealed from was rendered on the 22nd day of March, 1910. On that date the court made an order allowing plaintiff in error ten days in which to prepare and serve his case-made, the defendant five days thereafter in which to suggest amendment", and the case to be settled on five days’ notice. No further action was taken in the case until the 18th day of April, 1910, on which date plaintiff in error applied for and obtained an order from the trial judge extending the time in which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bettis v. CargileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Ellis v. CarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lovejoy, Russell & James v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Cripple Creek Oil Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Saxon v. HardinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Grounds v. DingmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. HowenstineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API