Legal Opinion

Bass v. Dowd

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 19, 1921No. 10085PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from County Court, Bryan County; Lewis "Paullin, Judge. Action by N. Dowd against Amos K. Bass. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

In this action the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and the court rendered judgment on the verdict. Motion for a new trial was filed by the defendant, and on the 20th day of March, 1918, the same was overruled. A part of the order overruling the motion for new trial reads as follows:

“Thereupon, the defendant prays an appeal to the Supreme Court, which appeal is allowed, and the defendant is granted sixty days from and after this date in which to prepare and serve a case-made on the plaintiff.”

Under this order the time expired on May 19, 1918. Thereafter, and on the 20th day…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tanner v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Soliss v. Davis, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Lovejoy, Russell & James v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Petty v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Sugg v. Farm Home Savings Loan Ass'n.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Shinn v. Oklahoma City Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Maben v. Tulsa Motor Security Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Remund v. Liberty Nat. Bank of WeatherfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API