Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 10, 1926No. 5PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This quo warranto proceeding challenges the right of defendant to occupy the office of public service commissioner.

We have very recently had occasion to review the status of those appointed members of the Public Service Commission in Com. ex rel. v. Benn, 284 Pa. 421, and shall not go over the ground covered in that case further than is necessary to formulate the reasons for the conclusion we reach in the one at bar. There we determined that the Governor in making appointments to the commission acted merely as the agent of the legislature. We said (pc 437) :…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Attorney General v. BennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Collins v. KephartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Fekete v. City of East St. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Armstrong v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Kucker v. Sunlight Oil & Gasoline Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Board of Finance & Revenue of CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. State ex rel. Kriebs v. HalladaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Sparrow v. MowersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. W. A. Schnader v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Sweeney v. King, SEC. of CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API