Legal Opinion

Lucas v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1992No. 90-1298PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Chief Judge:

Prior to appellant’s jury trial for heroin distribution in violation of D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(1) (1988 Repl.), the government filed an information pursuant to D.C.Code § 23-111(a)(1) (1989 Repl.) indicating that appellant had one prior conviction. In fact he had two. Following appellant’s conviction by a jury, appellant and the government agreed, as they do on appeal, that appellant should be sentenced as a second offender since the government’s pre-trial information only mentioned one prior enhancing conviction. However, despite the noncompliance with § 23-111, the trial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. YoungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Keels v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Ruffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API