Legal Opinion
Limone v. Condon
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 14, 2004No. 03-2130, 03-2212PublishedCited by 172 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
These interlocutory appeals follow the entry of an order denying motions to dismiss based on qualified immunity. See Limone v. United States, 271 F.Supp.2d 345, 349 (D.Mass.2003). The appellants exhort us to reverse that decree or, alternatively, to exercise pendent appellate jurisdiction over another (potentially disposi-tive) issue. We conclude that at this stage of the proceedings (i) the district court appropriately.rejected the appellants’ qualified immunity defenses, and (ii) the scope of these interlocutory appeals should not be broadened to encompass an unrelated…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by172 opinions
- Owens v. Baltimore City State's Attorneys OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Haley v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Byron Halsey v. Frank PfeifferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Herbert Whitlock v. Charles BrueggeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Hernandez-Cuevas v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
167 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.