Legal Opinion
Tela-News Flash, Inc. v. District Attorney
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 31, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHooley, J.
Motion to compel the respondent New York Telephone Company to continue its services to petitioner and that the other respondents, to wit, the District Attorney of Queens County and the police department of the City of New York be restrained from interfering in any manner with the petitioner in the operation of its business.
Insofar as the motion seeks to restrain the District Attorney of Queens County and the police department of the City of New York from interfering with the petitioner in the operation of its business, -the motion is denied. It is well settled that if the police or District…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Doolittle v. . Supervisors of Broome CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Matter of Whitman. No. 1New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Matter of City of New York (Ely Avenue)New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Hamilton v. . Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Matter of Harlem Check Cashing Corp. v. BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Paterson Publishing Co. v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Martinelli v. New York Telephone Co.New York Supreme Court · 1954
- Tela-News Flash, Inc. v. District AttorneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950