Matter of Harlem Check Cashing Corp. v. Bell
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
We are not persuaded that we are constrained by the decision in Weiss v. United States (308 U. S. 321) to condemn as illegal the disclosure and divulgence, by use in evidence, of the intercepted messages which were recorded by tapping wires in accordance with the statutes of the State as expressly authorized by the Constitution of the State (N. Y. Const., art. I, § 12; Code Crim. Pro., § 813-a). That case dealt with intercepted telephone messages procured without a court order and in violation of the laws of this State (Penal Law, § 1423, subd. 6) by a police officer acting under instructions…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Weiss v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Townsend v. YeomansSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Atchison Ry. v. Railroad Comm.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Weiss v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
3Cited by23 opinions
- Schwartz v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- People v. FeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- United States v. Charles v. GrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- People v. MaranianMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Commonwealth v. ChaittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.