Legal Opinion
Park West Village Associates v. Nishoika
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided October 26, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order entered on or about May 12, 1999 affirmed, with $10 costs.
The record conclusively establishes that in January 1995, roughly five years after the residential building premises underwent a non-eviction-type conversion to condominium ownership, tenant entered into possession of the apartment at issue under a now expired lease agreement, which prominently provided that the tenancy was not governed by any form of rent regulation and that tenant “does not have the right to renew the Lease.” On these undisputed facts, Civil Court properly awarded summary judgment to…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Paikoff v. HarrisAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1999
- Ebert v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Turner v. Department of Finance of the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
4Cited by6 opinions
- Geiser v. MaranAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2001
- MH Residential 1, LLC v. BarrettAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2008
- 300 East 64th Street Partners, LLC v. BoissevainCivil Court of the City of New York · 2016
- Arkansas Leasing Co. v. GabrielAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2004
- Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. Brooklyn Barber Equipment Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.