Legal Opinion
Ebert v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 15, 1993PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of Supreme Court should be modified, without costs, by imposing the 3% interest rate on the judgment, as prescribed in McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 7401 (5) and (6) (New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation Act § 20 [5], [6]; L 1969, ch 1016, § 1, as amended) in conjunction with General Municipal Law § 50-k; the judgment and orders otherwise brought up for review should be affirmed in all other respects, without costs.
Appellant New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation (NYCHHC) is ultimately the real defendant in interest under…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ebert v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by14 opinions
- Karney v. Arnot-Ogden Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Rao v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- O'Brien v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Simmons v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Nevarez v. New York City Health & Hospitals Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.