Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. Brooklyn Barber Equipment Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 31, 2003Published

1Dissent

McCooe, J.P

(dissenting in part). The majority dismissed the appeals on procedural grounds which leaves standing the motion court’s denial of the motion and cross motion for summary judgment. This opinion reaches the same result on the merits.

This is an action seeking to recover unpaid premiums and interest on a workers’ compensation insurance policy issued by the State Insurance Fund (SIF) to the defendants. SIF is a state agency authorized to issue workers’ compensation policies and collect premiums. The policy was canceled for nonpayment of premiums.

*16Plaintiff moved for summary judgment and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pardi v. BaroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. J.D.G.S. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Bath & Hammondsport Railroad v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. M. Mathews & Sons Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. Kenneth Yesmont & Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API