Legal Opinion

Hill v. Manning

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided September 20, 2022No. 1:21-cv-04549Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CARL M. HILL, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-04549-SDG S. ALEXANDRA MANNING, County Magistrate, Individual and Official Capacity; et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This case is before the Court on a frivolity review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). For the following reasons, this action is DISMISSED as frivolous. I. Background Plaintiff Carl M. Hill, pro se, initiated suit on November 3, 2021, and sought to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP).1 On November 5, the magistrate judge granted Hill’s IFP…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API