Legal Opinion
Casey v. Schlesinger
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided July 17, 1974No. 74-C-31PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
Petitioner is a member of the United States Navy Reserve who has been ordered to a period of involuntary active duty because he failed to attend the required number of Reserve drills. He has filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus praying that Respondents be enjoined from removing him from this jurisdiction until the final determination of the Petition and that upon final determination an order be issued by this Court directing Respondents .to withdraw Petitioner’s orders to involuntary active duty. Among Petitioner’s allegations is the assertion…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gusik v. SchilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Strait v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Schatten v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Karlin v. ClaytonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1981
- Adkins v. United States NavyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1981
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. LujanDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1992