Legal Opinion
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Lujan
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided December 22, 1992No. 89-C-892-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRETT, District Judge.
This matter comes on for consideration of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. These motions were originally filed January 21, 1992, 1 along with supporting memorandums that addressed a plethora of issues. Reply memorandums were filed April 6, 1992, by both parties. The Court heard oral arguments on the pending motions on June 19, 1992. At that hearing, the Court determined that it should first address the statute of limitations issue, in order to allow the parties to file an interlocutory appeal along with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Frontier Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Dr. H. G. Withrow, F/d/b/a Hustisford HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- ST. REGIS PAPER COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ray MARSHALL, Secretary of Labor, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. ALA. DEPT. OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCESSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Weatherly v. Universal Music Publishing GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004