Legal Opinion

Shedenhelm v. Myers

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 7, 1944No. 301PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

It having been heretofore determined by this court (Shedenhelm v. Myers, 76 Ohio App., 28) that this cause is not a chancery cause and, therefore, may not be retried upon the facts, it is submitted and heard as an appeal upon questions of law.

The appeal is from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Seneca county in an action wherein Adella M. Shedenhelm, the appellee herein, was plaintiff, and Ray C. Myers, the appellant herein, was defendant.

The judgment appealed from is in the words and figures following, to wit:

“It is therefore considered and adjudged by the court that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harris v. CarlisleOhio Supreme Court · 1843
  2. Rabb v. Cuyahoga County CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Beck v. BeckOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Shedenhelm v. MyersOhio Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. SchlerethNebraska Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API