Legal Opinion

Rabb v. Cuyahoga County Commissioners

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1930No. 10409PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

At this juncture a proper consideration of the case demands that we consider the legal status of the plaintiff who obtained the judgment by default. During the term in which the default was rendered, the court having control of its docket had full power sua sponta or otherwise, to suspend or vacate the judgment. This power was not only inherent in the court but established by a long line of authorities and there is nothing that could take this power from the court during the term in which the judgment by default was rendered. This power and control over the judgment during term ceases when…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  2. Cale Products, Inc. v. Orrville Bronze & Aluminum Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Bellows v. BowlusOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Daneman v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (In Re Hoff)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995
  5. Grelle, Jr. v. HumbelOhio Court of Appeals · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API