Ritter v. Braash
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from orders denying a motion to strike out defendant’s answer and cross-complaint, and a motion to set aside a default judgment entered on the cross-complaint. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
Action to cancel promissory note. Default judgment was entered on cross-complaint of defendant praying for judgment on the note. Appeal is by plaintiff from this judgment, from an order of the superior court denying his motion to strike defendant’s answer and cross-complaint from the files, and from an order of the court denying his motion to set aside the default entered on the cross-complaint.
Complaint was filed December 3, 1908, demurrer thereto December 11th, and on December 18, 1908, demurrer was overruled. On December 23, 1908, an answer and cross-complaint separately stated, but bound…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Edwards v. HellingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Estate of NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Rose v. MesmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Wood v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
3Cited by2 opinions
- Adam v. SaengerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Lyydikainen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939