Gordon v. Farrell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Employers seek review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order holding that respondent Farrell (claimant) was a subject worker at the time of his injury. We affirm.
Employers are husband and wife and partners in the ownership of a five-unit rental complex and a farm on which their home is located.1 Claimant and his wife began renting one of the units in January, 1984, for $200 per month. Shortly thereafter, the parties agreed that the Farrells would manage the units for a rent deduction of $55 a month plus $5 for each additional hour over 11 hours per month worked by claimant or his wife.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Anfilofieff v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Konell v. KonellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- Progressive Casualty Insurance v. MarcaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- NCE-Deer Lodge Apartments v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Progressive Casualty Insurance v. MarcaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990