Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Farrell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 3, 1987No. WCB 84-08997; CA A38881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Employers seek review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order holding that respondent Farrell (claimant) was a subject worker at the time of his injury. We affirm.

Employers are husband and wife and partners in the ownership of a five-unit rental complex and a farm on which their home is located.1 Claimant and his wife began renting one of the units in January, 1984, for $200 per month. Shortly thereafter, the parties agreed that the Farrells would manage the units for a rent deduction of $55 a month plus $5 for each additional hour over 11 hours per month worked by claimant or his wife.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anfilofieff v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Konell v. KonellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. MarcaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. NCE-Deer Lodge Apartments v. HartmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. MarcaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API