Legal Opinion
Konell v. Konell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 6, 1980No. 78-9538 & 78-9969, CA 17203PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P.J.
This workers’ compensation case presents two questions: (1) was the claimant a subject worker, ORS 656.027; and (2) was the employer a subject employer, ORS 656.023.
The referee answered both questions in the negative, rejecting the claim. The Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) reversed. Employer appeals. We review de novo. ORS 656.298(6); Coday v. Willamette Tug & Barge, 250 Or 39, 440 P2d 224 (1968); Brenner v. Industrial Indemnity Co., 30 Or App 69, 566 P2d 530 (1977).
ORS 656.023 provides:
"Every employer employing one or more subject workers in the state is subject to ORS 656.001 to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coday v. WILLAMETTE TUG & BARGE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Miller v. Granite Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Fredrickson v. GRANDMA COOKIE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- Raines v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Brenner v. Industrial Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hopkins v. Kobos Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- DCBS v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Bisbey v. ThedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Gordon v. FarrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Department of Consumer & Business Services v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.