Legal Opinion

Brookside Memorials, Inc. v. Barre City

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 13, 1997No. 96-429PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff Brookside Memorials, Inc., a granite manufacturer seeking a refund for sewer bill overpay-ments it made to defendant Barre City over a six-year period, appeals the superior court’s order granting the City summary judgment. We hold that under the facts and circumstances of this case, plaintiff is entitled to the requested refund; accordingly, we reverse the court’s order and grant summary judgment to plaintiff.

Plaintiff is a Barre City business engaged in the manufacture and distribution of granite memorials and other granite products. The building in which plaintiff is located was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Getto v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. United States v. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. American Tierra Corp. v. City of West JordanUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Legault v. LegaultSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  5. Marshall Durbin & Co. v. Jasper Utilities Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gallipo v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  2. Skyland Metropolitan District v. Mountain West Enterprise, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Kellogg v. ShusherebaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. Johnson v. HarwoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  5. D.R. Ward Construction Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API