Legal Opinion
Armotek Industries, Inc. v. Freedman
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 13, 1992No. Civ. A. H-88-497 (JAC)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, District Judge:
Pending before the court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (filed Sept. 12, 1991) of defendants Seymour Freedman, Helene Freedman and S. Freedman Electric, Inc., which was submitted for decision after oral argument on January 29, 1992.
Background
Defendants Seymour Freedman and Helene Freedman are officers and directors of S. Freedman Electric, Inc. (“Electric”). From 1977 through November 1, 1979, Electric owned Chambers-Storck Company (“Chambers-Storck”), which operated a chrome-plating plant in Norwich,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Saltiel v. GSI Consultants, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Hatco Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co.—Conn.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Hulbert Revoc. Living Trust v. Port EverettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Olin Corp. v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Hulbert v. Port of EverettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.