Matison v. Barassi
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Appellees, hereinafter referred to as Barassi, brought suit against appellants, hereinafter referred to as Matison, to recover $4,500 on a promissory note received in partial consideration for a lot and building sold to Matison. At the time of sale, Barassi was in the process of restoring the 1885 adobe buildings located on the lot situated in the Tucson Barrio. A second count sought $600 as reasonable rental for the property, $484.76 for utilities and $439.62 for expenditures and repairs furnished to Matison. Matison answered denying anything was due on the note and as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Northen v. ElledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Sobel v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Pace v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Miller v. Superior Court in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Neil B. McGinnis Equipment Co. v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Industrial Power & Lighting Corp. v. Western Modular Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Barassi v. MatisonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Mohave Concrete & Materials, Inc. v. ScaramuzzoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Twin Peaks Construction Inc. v. Weatherguard Metal Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Industrial Power & Lighting Corp. v. Western Modular Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.