Legal Opinion

Adams v. Cambridge Wire Cloth Co.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 9, 1986No. 57, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.

The only issue presented on this appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City is:

Did Cambridge Wire Cloth, the appellee/employer, make offers of suitable work to the appellants so as to disqualify them from unemployment compensation benefits under Maryland Annotated Code Art. 95A, § 6(d)?

Appellee, Board of Appeals of the Department of Employment and Training, (“Board”) found as a fact that it did, and the Circuit Court agreed. Our review of the record convinces us that the Board’s findings of fact in this regard are “supported by competent, material…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ramsay, Scarlett & Co. v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Baltimore Lutheran High School Ass'n v. Employment Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Employment Security Board v. LeCatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  4. Commissioner, Baltimore City Police Department v. CasonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Johnston v. Chrysler CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc. v. Department of Employment & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. CallahanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Department of Economic & Employment Development v. PropperCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Facello v. Department of Economic & Employment DevelopmentCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API