Legal Opinion

State v. Pennington

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1997No. 01S01-9607-PB-00133PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRCH, Justice.

We review this cause to determine whether detention immediately after arrest, purposely continued because of the accused’s refusal to submit to a breathalyzer test, constitutes punishment that prevents, under double jeopardy principles, punishment upon conviction. Because we find that jeopardy did not attach to the proceedings before the judicial commissioner and because the detention, even if punitive, did not constitute punishment for the charged offenses, we find no double jeopardy violation. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals is reversed, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Joey DeWayne ThompsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Ahern v. AhernTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Dorsey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
  4. State v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  5. Dorsey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API