Legal Opinion

Ahern v. Ahern

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2000No. W1997-00233-SC-R11-CVPublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLDER, J.

We granted this appeal to determine: 1) whether the constitutional protections against double jeopardy prevented the defendant’s retrial for criminal contempt after testimony had been taken by one judge and the case was then transferred to a second judge; and 2) whether the defendant was entitled to a jury trial when the defendant was tried for criminal contempt under Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-9-102 et seq. (1980).

We conclude that the constitutional protections against double jeopardy prohibited the defendant’s retrial for criminal contempt because testimony was taken prior to the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Flautt & Mann v. Council of City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  2. Tracy Rose Baker v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State ex. rel. Flowers v. Tennessee Trucking Ass'n Self Insurance Group TrustCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  4. Moody v. HutchisonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  5. Overnite Transportation Co. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 480Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API