Legal Opinion
Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 1, 2013No. Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHKPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: DAMAGES
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
In this patent case, a jury found that a range of Samsung products infringe several of Apple’s design and utility patents, and that several Samsung products dilute Apple’s trade dress. The jury awarded $1,049,343,540.00 in damages, and provided a breakdown of this award by Samsung product. In their post-trial motions, the parties have raised a number of issues concerning the damages in this case. Specifically, Apple has requested additur, supplemental damages, and prejudgment interest, see Apple’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (“Apple…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Samuel Gart v. Logitech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- C&C Properties, Inc. v. Shell Pipeline CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Componex Corp. v. Electronics for Imaging, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014
- Gallagher v. Funeral Source One et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015