Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Baldwin v. Moore

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1893No. 980PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from. Superior Court, Thurston County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Soott, J.

The question presented’ in this case involves the validity of that part of § 11 of the act approved March 11, 1893, relating to the duties of county auditors (Sess. Laws, 1893; p. 284, § 11), providing that the auditor shall refuse to receive or record any deed of real property unless it is accompanied by a certificate of the county treasurer “that all taxes theretofore levied, and which have become a charge on said property according to the books and records of his office, have been fully paid and discharged, ’ ’ and, if valid, whether or not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Reed v. TylerIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. State ex rel. McCardy v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Sinclair v. LearnedMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Hart v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1868

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Northern Cedar Co. v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Thiessen v. WeberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. Thurston County v. Tenino Stone Quarries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Phillip Edward Sifferman, V. Chelan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API