Legal Opinion

(PC) Bailey v. Clason

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 2, 2023No. 2:22-cv-01670Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE LAMAR BAILEY, No. 2:22-cv-1670 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 J. CLASON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants violated his rights under the First, Eighth, and 19 Fourteenth Amendments. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma 20 pauperis (ECF No. 2) and his complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth 21 below, the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API